Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old July 5th, 2009 #101
Magog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,191
Default

I do like this place for the fact once you hit post, you can see it right away and do not have to wait 2 days for a mod to post it.

I do understand what they want to do, and that is cool. I think we can have multi sides to our cause.

Obama is a stupid ass nigger ape, who is 100% shitless with out a telli prompter.
I think if you hate obama you shuold be able to say it out loud and in public for all to see.

Obama is a stuppid ass nigger. That stupid ass nigger I do not follow.


Now if you are stupid enough to threaten his life, then you need to be told to shut up and learn the fuckign laws.

We can hate all we wish, hate is a god given right and we all are free to hate whoever we wish and express our hate openingly.

No one has a right to threaten anyone. And to do that in public is as stupid as any fiucking dumb ass nigger could be.

That shit is ment for privet talks with no government agents around or able to hear, or anyone to tape or record in anyway.
 
Old July 5th, 2009 #102
DiCarlo
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Right of Stormfront
Posts: 988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom McReen View Post
Taken at the last Stormfront mods meeting.

Which one's Bjerkoff?
 
Old July 5th, 2009 #103
fossilator
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiCarlo View Post
I have no problem receiving punishment for breaking rules, but I have a large problem with being silenced for no other reason than being bullied by A MAJOR ASSHOLE who can openly insult me in front of my peers, and when asked to provide an intelligent reason for doing so, simply bans me.
You were probably one of the most articulate and strongest posters there. Straight forward, uncompromising and unapologetic. What better reason to silence you? The want a bunch of middle aged women with fake Celtic names and fairy princess avatars because they honestly think that will help them in their miserable and futile attempt to appeal to the "mainstream" (you know, the folks that live each week for Howie Do It and The Bachelor) and to bring in the soccer moms and their potentially deep fanny packs$. Deluded? You bet! But their reign of terror is just beginning..stay tuned.
 
Old July 6th, 2009 #104
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1
Default

If someone have the balls to speak is banned.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=616818
 
Old July 7th, 2009 #105
DiCarlo
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Right of Stormfront
Posts: 988
Default

Thanks for the link!

I see the con-artist is still trying to make it about the code of conduct, when it is nothing of the kind. It's about requiring all members to post opinions that are in lockstep with certain moderators who value the guests more than the members. At the same time, these mods make it seem as though they are talking about some radical, extreme, element, when what they are doing is really about reaching out to neocons, jews, blacks, or anyone to populate the roles at SF. The moderate infiltrators who are already members, and even blacks and jews applaud the views of these moderators by saying so in these threads, while other more traditional SFers are banned and portrayed as extreme. Sounds like what's been going on in our jew controlled society. Those who want to know what happened to America, are now the new terrorists. Even Ron Paul supporters are terrorists. Ridiculous comments like this:

Quote:
People should respect Stormfront enough to either conform, or leave if they cannot.
Conform to what? The "new" Stormfront? Change? I noticed a lot of brown-nosing too. Check it out! Moderators stepping out of line, but an army of excuse making brown-nosers to excuse the nonsense. This is a growing behavior across our gelded society, if not the majority view. What is the purpose of it? To build a bridge to the jews who are destroying our White society? We'll be treated respectfully in the media? Give me a break!

Comically enough, the offending moderator brings up David Duke, and others of note, as examples, and asks if they strike out forcefully at the jews who destroy our society. Of course, David Duke is a perfect gentleman, does not preach hate, but preservation of the White race, but he spends most of his time fending off misrepresentations about what he believes, and accusations that he is a racist, anti-Semite, and the everpresent report that he was the former Grand Wizard of the KKK. Is that the good press SF will receive if it reaches out to muds and jews, and becomes moderate and mainstream? LOL!


http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=616818
 
Old July 7th, 2009 #106
TowardWewelsburg
Member
 
TowardWewelsburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vinland (NE U.S.A.)
Posts: 408
Default

To make long story short: I was banned from Stormfront because a group of moderators (Rich Lindstrom aka Bjarni and Jim aka Jack Boot/Whiteman Jack) saw me chatting with Bill White in the lobby of the hotel in which Amren was taking place. That's it. That was enough for them to try to completely ruin my reputation. They didn't actually confront me about it, of course, but rather went around backstabbing me like gossiping women.

When I came back from Amren (I drove there with another SF moderator who has recently apologised for his behaviour, so I shall not name him), I found that I was banned from Stormfront. I didn't post there much anyway (I think I accumulated 4 posts in as many years), but I was annoyed that my PMs were now gone, and the reason for my banning was listed as: "ANSWP Reichsmeister auf der Kloburste," which was a completely unnecessary insult and a lie. I was never a member of the ANSWP and I only met Bill White on one occasion: at the lobby during the American Renaissance conference. What they thought was my real name, and what they thought was the name of my fiance, were also leaked to OPP and published under the list of Amren attendees. Through the backchannels, they accused me of being everything from a Bill White asset to an FBI informant bearing a "ZOG tattoo"

Lesson of the day: Not only is SF filled with reactionary scum who should be lined up against a wall, but its moderators are cowards and gossips who will smile to your face as they are pocketing your check and handing your name and address over to our enemies.
__________________
"Heiden sind alle, die zum Leben ja sagen, denen "Gott" das Wort für das Große Ja zu allen Dingen ist." – Nietzsche
 
Old July 8th, 2009 #107
fossilator
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 388
Default The SF "Cleansing" movement

Stormfront has become a joke and it would be funny watching them implode if it wasn't just plain sinister. The trouble is that it is damaging to the cause of white unity. First they decided to weed out the Klan and the NS (sticking a knife in the backs of the ones who were with them in the beginning with money, time and support) because those groups were not politically correct enough for their proposed "new image". Okay, right or wrong, some people might at least see some logic or reasoning in that. But then they started attacking anyone who voiced too strong of an opinion because it might offend hostile "guests" in Open Forums. These "guests" are invited to insult members but the members have to fight back with one arm tied behind their backs because "more is expected of them" (?). And then, apparently reveling in their power, they started on people who didn't really break any rules but simply said something one of the mods didn't like or members who wouldn't kiss ass fast enough.

The mods are abetted in this by that very suspicious flock of "teacher's pet" members who miraculously work in perfect sync with one another. They constantly praise and stroke the mods who are championing "moderation". This little coven seem to be around the place 24 hours a day, with at least two or three of them always together at the same time in the same threads. When anybody criticizes a bad decision of the mods or the tyranical new direction the place is taking, they instantly swoop down and viciously attack that person.

It's become more like an old Soviet-style indoctrination facility intended to break the will of strong minded people. Sickening, unwhite and counter productive. Worse, it has fractured the movement and alienated potential recruits. The SPLC, JDL, ADL, etc. could not have done a better job and most assuredly are all sitting in their offices laughing their asses off at the insanity of it all.

Stormfront has left a trail of debris in its latest reign of terror and stunned (what at this rate must be) hundreds of angry, disappointed members who the SF gods decided were just not good enough for the place anymore. Every single day more people there are being harassed, moderated or banned, lots of old timers, lots of loyal members and even sustaining members. The KBG's own "White Resistance 14" brags that if it was up to him, he'd do a "thorough cleansing" !!! As if the pompous little twerp hasn't done enough damage already! They are either too stupid to see it or it is a planned, intentional destruction. What would motivate it, one can only guess at. But it is probably colored green.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #108
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1
jewsign

Stormcohen administration is now using IP blocks against WN's that refuse to ass lick the Jews, blacks, asians, etc...
 
Old July 19th, 2009 #109
rod crowley
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North dakota
Posts: 332
Default

Jewfront doesnt want real wns on their forum and do all they can to make you say fuck'em!Niggers,kikes...all nonwhites are welcome but true wns...hell no!FUCK JEWFRONT!
 
Old July 19th, 2009 #110
rod crowley
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North dakota
Posts: 332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickHolland View Post
If someone have the balls to speak is banned.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=616818
if you're outspoken and truthful at stormfront....you're history.
 
Old July 19th, 2009 #111
DiCarlo
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Right of Stormfront
Posts: 988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickHolland View Post
Stormcohen administration is now using IP blocks against WN's that refuse to ass lick the Jews, blacks, asians, etc...
They must have started that trick a couple months ago, at least in my experience. That was when I first experienced it. I mean, how would you know unless it happened to you. Now, I think this info is coming out. I thought SF was down for about three days before I got the impression it wasn't by some info I came across. I had friends log on with no problem. I thought somehow the jews I regularly excoriate could somehow prevent me from getting on, but now it is because of my outspokenness, exposing jews, that I was being blocked by those who could at SF itself. Since then, my IP has been blocked two more times. If any of you are experiencing a difficulty in accessing SF, just change your IP address and you'll be good to go.
 
Old August 8th, 2009 #112
rod crowley
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North dakota
Posts: 332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickHolland View Post
Stormcohen administration is now using IP blocks against WN's that refuse to ass lick the Jews, blacks, asians, etc...
Agreed!very well said.
 
Old August 8th, 2009 #113
rod crowley
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North dakota
Posts: 332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H.B. View Post
Nutless wonders indeed - do they think this is going to help get them an invite to the White House?

Banning "racial slurs" and "Nazi" symbols is one thing - not being allowed to call Obongo Obongo, is a whole other.

I too have enjoyed your posts over the years at Stomfluff but pretty much stopped posting when they banned all reference to other WN message boards except for their own.
Sf doesnt want whites with a spine all they desire are gutless,nutless sheeple..the very kind that helped obongo get elected...FUCK JEWFRONT!14/88
 
Old August 8th, 2009 #114
Igor Alexander
Senior Member
 
Igor Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
Professors come in all types and they wouldn't want a Professor at Stormfront really: for the simple reason that most Professors have the raw intelligence to work out that most of their positions are junk.
You hold professors in too high esteem. One can have a high IQ and be well-read and yet be dumb as a post. It's actually not that uncommon.

Raw intelligence doesn't make one less likely to hold a false position; it just means one can do a better job of defending it. A Ph.D. is no guarantee of intellectual honesty (and these days, I'd take it more as an indication of the opposite).
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history.
http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/

Last edited by Igor Alexander; August 8th, 2009 at 12:51 PM.
 
Old August 8th, 2009 #115
Igor Alexander
Senior Member
 
Igor Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPQR View Post
A reactionary is . adjective.."of, pertaining to, marked by, or favoring reaction, esp. extreme conservatism or rightism in politics; opposing political or social change."
In other words, a reactionary is anyone who opposes the leftist/liberal agenda. Just another way for liberals to say that they're right and that anyone who opposes them is evil.
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history.
http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/
 
Old August 8th, 2009 #116
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor Alexander View Post
You hold professors in too high esteem.
Not really: in fact if you knew me better you'd find I tend to hold them in the opposite, but I never-the-less recognise what general intellectual abilities they have and that precludes most of them from joining loony-tune positions that you find en masse at Stormfront (e.g. Chem trails, Apollo Hoax, Creationism, the 'White History' crowd etc).

Quote:
One can have a high IQ and be well-read and yet be dumb as a post. It's actually not that uncommon.
Indeed, but Professors know quite a lot about intellectual rigour and that makes 'WN' positions and especially those at Stormfront very unattractive, because anybody who is able to do the necessary doctorate and post-doctorate work knows that they have to do some source-checking and they will generally do that. Since 'WN' positions are based on very little intellectually speaking and are hence quite unattractive in that they are also completely unsystematic. You'd have to go into NS literature or go a long way back to find very much worth reading beyond a couple of authors most of whom are middle-brow or obscure.

Quote:
Raw intelligence doesn't make one less likely to hold a false position; it just means one can do a better job of defending it.
No, but you see I am not talking about 'raw intelligence', if you wish to put it that way, what I am talking about critical intelligence, which academics are more likely to show traits of than any other part of the population if you look at it by occupation.

Quote:
A Ph.D. is no guarantee of intellectual honesty (and these days, I'd take it more as an indication of the opposite).
Actually that isn't very true, because a lot of academics and PhD holders are very intellectually honest (they are not intellectually dishonest, because they don't agree with your politics or general positions), but there are specific areas which have large clusters of intellectually dishonest academics and PhD holders generally clustered around specific schools of thought (for example the 'critical race theory' crowd).

To be honest I have met more intellectually honest people among academics and PhD holders than I have intellectually honest people in any political movement I have looked into that includes 'WN'. The only exception would be National Socialism and that automatically discludes all the neos who wander around saying 'I'm a National Socialist' when they don't even know the absolute basics let alone put them into practice.
__________________

Last edited by Karl Radl; August 8th, 2009 at 01:18 PM.
 
Old August 8th, 2009 #117
Igor Alexander
Senior Member
 
Igor Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peer Fischer View Post
Right. It's even in the Horst Wessel Lied, though it has a more sinister overtone as the song portrays reactionaries and reds fighting against the NSDAP:

Die Fahne hoch! Die Reihen fest geschlossen!
SA marschiert mit mutig-festem Schritt.
Kam'raden, die Rotfront und Reaktion erschossen,
Marschier'n im Geist in uns'ren Reihen mit.


Trans:

Flag high! Ranks closed tight!
The stormtroopers march with bold, firm step.
Comrades shot by Reds and Reactionaries
March in spirit within our ranks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horst_Wessel_Lied
Are you sure "Reaktion" translates to "reactionaries"? I'm not sure exactly what "Reaktion" would mean in the song's context, but my German-English dictionary tells me that the word just means "reaction."
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history.
http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/

Last edited by Igor Alexander; August 8th, 2009 at 01:19 PM.
 
Old August 8th, 2009 #118
Igor Alexander
Senior Member
 
Igor Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
Default

An online English-German dictionary tells me that the German word for a reactionary is a Reaktionaer.
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history.
http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/
 
Old August 8th, 2009 #119
Igor Alexander
Senior Member
 
Igor Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
Not really: in fact if you knew me better you'd find I tend to hold them in the opposite, but I never-the-less recognise what general intellectual abilities they have and that precludes most of them from joining loony-tune positions that you find en masse at Stormfront (e.g. Chem trails, Apollo Hoax, Creationism, the 'White History' crowd etc).
Professors are repulsed by those things because they are some of the biggest conformists around, not because they've actually taken the time to study them and determined that they are false. If tomorrow it became fashionable to believe that the moon landing was a hoax, the majority of professors (at least in the liberal arts, maybe not in the hard sciences) would switch their views accordingly. Old-school profs who have a backbone are a rarity these days and aren't being hired by universities anymore. These days, you don't get hired if you don't toe the party line.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
Indeed, but Professors know quite a lot about intellectual rigour and that makes 'WN' positions and especially those at Stormfront very unattractive, because anybody who is able to do the necessary doctorate and post-doctorate work knows that they have to do some source-checking and they will generally do that.
There are many fields which are really not that rigorous: literature, art history, film studies, sociology, etc. Profs in these fields can and regularly do spout off their opinions as facts, and their opinions aren't necessarily superior to the layman's. Political science and history might be a little more rigorous, but the same thing happens there.

It's also not unheard of for profs to falsify their research. I mean, who's going to call them on it: their "peers," who are doing the same thing? How many decades did it take before it came to light that Alfred Kinsey and Margaret Mead had falsified their data? How many years before Michael Mann's "Hockey Stick" graph was exposed as a fraud?

As Michael Mann's deception proves, even fields like climatology have become politicized. And that's to say nothing of the overtly politicized departments like "women's studies."

As an undergraduate in university, I quickly learned that the key to getting good grades in my world history and anthropology courses was to spout off as much PC nonsense as possible. The key to getting good grades in my philosophy and European history courses was to regurgitate the professor's opinions verbatim (conversely, if you wanted a bad grade, all you had to do was turn in an original paper).

My first year English literature course started out with a lengthy rant by the professor about how "sinister" Joseph McCarthy was. Can someone tell me WTF my professor's views of Senator McCarthy have to do with English literature? It's not like we were studying The Crucible or anything. I mean, what do these people get paid for really?

I even once had a chemistry professor waste 15 minutes of class time to get up on soapbox about political topics that were only peripherally related to chemistry (I think that one may have been a jew).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
Since 'WN' positions are based on very little intellectually speaking and are hence quite unattractive in that they are also completely unsystematic.
I challenge you to find any flaws or inconsistencies in my views. I call myself a WN because there is no other label that fits me.

WN has more going for it intellectually than any of the currently dominant political ideas. It certainly has more to offer than, say, neo-conservatism or modern liberalism.

Of course WN isn't going to appeal to stuffy intellectuals because its message is ultimately very simple. Race isn't an idea (contrary to what leftist professors try to assert), race just is. Unlike communism, WN isn't going to accord any special place to professors, so they don't have any vested reason to support it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
You'd have to go into NS literature or go a long way back to find very much worth reading beyond a couple of authors most of whom are middle-brow or obscure.
Well, what are you looking for exactly? I pick causes that I think are right, not on the basis of whether they're intellectually stimulating.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
No, but you see I am not talking about 'raw intelligence', if you wish to put it that way,
I used the term "raw intelligence" because that's the phrase you used in the post I responded to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
what I am talking about critical intelligence, which academics are more likely to show traits of than any other part of the population if you look at it by occupation.
I completely disagree. My point was that academics may have raw intelligence, but little critical intelligence, and little capacity for original thought, which ties in with critical intelligence. Just the oppposite of what you're claiming.

There are many, many intellectual poseurs in academia, especially in the humanities. They get by on regurgitating what they read, or by expressing themselves in the most convoluted manner possible so as to create the illusion of depth where there is none. If it looks complicated enough and they say it with confidence, few will dare question them. Ask them to debate their ideas and they are incapable of doing so. Once they see you aren't falling for their BS, they'll eventually resort to obfuscation, name-calling, appeals to authority, etc.

The reason we have people like this our universities is because the Ph.D. has been clouded with a haze of holiness in our society. No one dares question a Ph.D. What the Ph.D. says must be true, even if it's, well, not.

A lot of these people are standing butt naked, but no one dares point it out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
Actually that isn't very true, because a lot of academics and PhD holders are very intellectually honest
Not the ones I've known, including my father, a tenured university professor who started university at 16 and had earned his Ph.D. by his early 20's (incidentally, it turns out his thesis advisor was ripping off his thesis while it was being written and having it published in journals under his own name -- pretty honest, uh?).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
(they are not intellectually dishonest, because they don't agree with your politics or general positions),
If I state that I am against welfare and a professor states that he is for welfare, I can accept that that is a legitimate difference of opinion and that he is not necessarily being dishonest by disagreeing with me. Of course, that is his private opinion and he should not be imposing his views on his students or letting it affect his professional life in any other way.

But if, for example, a forensic anthropologist publicly states that "race does not exist," not because he doesn't know any better, but because he doesn't want to encourage "Nazism," does that make him intellectually honest? I would say that it does not.

Nearly all university professors are like this to a greater or lesser extent. Some of them may think they're doing the right thing, but I think most of them just know on which side their bread is buttered.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
To be honest I have met more intellectually honest people among academics and PhD holders than I have intellectually honest people in any political movement I have looked into that includes 'WN'.
I'm not sure what you're trying to get at here. Don't professors hold political views? Don't they join political parties or movements? Don't they even push their political views on their students?

If the majority of professors in the U.S. are Democrats, and they are more intellectually honest than the norm, does that mean that Democrats are the most intellectually honest party?

This is ultimately a silly argument because I know from other threads that you don't believe in the holocaust. Now, what percentage of history professors do you think would be willing to publicly state that something doesn't quite add up about the holocaust story? Maybe a fraction of 1 per cent? And yet you would argue that the majority of these professors are intellectually honest?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
The only exception would be National Socialism and that automatically discludes all the neos who wander around saying 'I'm a National Socialist' when they don't even know the absolute basics let alone put them into practice.
Well, I've encountered quite a bit of sophistry from people calling themselves national socialists as well.

Just as Linder suggests WN's attack conservatives to make themselves visible, I guess NS's feel they need to attack WN to stand out.

What bothers me about NS, to the extent that I understand it, is the "socialism" part. I'm not sure it's a good idea to tie racial self-preservation to an economic system, especially one that may not reflect present realities. In fact, in Western and Northern Europe at least, if they could kick out the muds, they would effectively have "national socialism" there, since they already have the "socialist" part. What does NS have to offer those countries that they wouldn't already have if it weren't for the mud they're being flooded with?

A Dutch couple was staying at my place last year. The woman bragged about how they only have to work 4 days a week there. She and her husband seem to go somewhere on vacation every year. They have the "socialism" part down pat there. What they need to work on is the "nationalism" part. Enter white nationalism.
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history.
http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/

Last edited by Igor Alexander; August 8th, 2009 at 04:30 PM.
 
Old August 10th, 2009 #120
Randolph Dilloway
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You can count SmokyMtnSS as one of your fellow SF exiles.

I knew my days were numbered when I passed Don Black and David Duke on the rep parade within a few hours.

Horrors if someone other than a jew get the most reps on that forum.

Am friends with someone who is coming out with a book on Stormfront this fall. You all will have to figure out who is who, but the author is going to give me a cheat sheet.
 
Reply

Tags
hnic, obuengo mañana, stormfront, wn lite= fail

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.
Page generated in 0.41922 seconds.